Codex and Cursor are reshaping how developers code. This blog breaks down their features, pros, and cons to help you decide which AI-powered assistant best fits your workflow.

Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI represent two competing visions for AI-assisted development: one as a comprehensive coding partner, the other as a flexible coding tool. After extensive testing on production codebases, Claude Code's superior architectural understanding, sub-agent capabilities, and project-wide context management make it the clear choice for professional developers, despite its premium pricing.

Learn what Claude Code is, how to install it, and why its agentic CLI beats traditional copilots for multi-file refactors and code reviews.

This is a step-by-step, quick guide on how to analyze data using Google Sheets. It starts by organizing and cleaning raw data by addressing common issues like inconsistent formatting and duplicates. The guide then explains essential functions like COUNTIF(), SUMIF(), and VLOOKUP() to extract specific insights. Finally, it demonstrates how to summarize data using pivot tables and visualize findings with charts, helping users turn raw data into clear, actionable insights for making informed decisions.

When preparing for a Snowflake interview, many developers wonder whether to focus on the popular Blind 75 list or master LeetCode patterns. Blind 75 offers a curated, high-yield set of problems that cover the essentials, making it great for structured prep under time constraints. However, Snowflake interviews often demand adaptability, which is where LeetCode patterns shine—teaching you to recognize problem types and apply reusable strategies rather than memorizing solutions. While Blind 75 builds confidence and ensures coverage of core data structures and algorithms, patterns prepare you for the unexpected twists in real interviews. The best approach blends both: start with Blind 75 to strengthen fundamentals, then shift to LeetCode patterns to sharpen problem-solving instincts and handle novel variations. Ultimately, success at Snowflake comes from mastering concepts, practicing adaptability, and balancing breadth with depth in your prep.

Airbnb’s technical interviews emphasize not only problem-solving skills but also clear communication and adaptability. When choosing between Blind 75 and LeetCode patterns for prep, each has its strengths. Blind 75 provides a focused set of essential problems that build a strong foundation in data structures and algorithms, perfect for brushing up under time pressure. However, Airbnb interviewers often value creativity and the ability to recognize problem categories quickly—making LeetCode patterns especially effective. By mastering patterns, you learn how to approach unseen questions with structured strategies rather than relying on rote memorization. A balanced approach works best: begin with Blind 75 to ensure core coverage, then dive into LeetCode patterns to refine adaptability and problem recognition. For Airbnb, where collaboration and explanation matter, practicing patterns also helps you articulate your thought process, a key skill for standing out.

Netflix interviews are known for their rigor and emphasis on both technical depth and problem-solving flexibility. Many candidates wonder whether to stick with the structured NeetCode 150 or focus on mastering LeetCode patterns. NeetCode 150 offers a comprehensive and well-organized roadmap, covering more ground than Blind 75 and ensuring you won’t miss key data structure and algorithm concepts. However, Netflix interviewers often push candidates with unique twists, making LeetCode patterns invaluable. Patterns help you recognize underlying problem types and apply systematic strategies, rather than relying on memorization. The most effective prep combines both: use NeetCode 150 to build broad technical strength and confidence, then layer in LeetCode patterns to sharpen adaptability and handle novel variations. For Netflix, where innovation and clear reasoning are prized, this hybrid approach equips you to not only solve problems but also explain your thinking under pressure.

Google’s technical interviews are notoriously challenging, requiring both strong fundamentals and the ability to think through novel problems under pressure. Candidates often debate whether to follow NeetCode 150 or master LeetCode patterns. NeetCode 150 provides a clear, structured progression through a wide range of problems, ensuring thorough coverage of essential algorithms and data structures. It’s excellent for building a solid base and practicing consistently. Yet, Google interviews are famous for unpredictable twists, making LeetCode patterns especially powerful. Patterns teach you to recognize recurring problem archetypes and apply adaptable strategies, which is critical when facing unseen variations. The optimal prep blends both: use NeetCode 150 to gain breadth and confidence, then leverage patterns to strengthen adaptability and problem recognition. For Google, success lies in not just solving the problem, but also demonstrating creativity, clarity of thought, and systematic reasoning throughout t