Why do we partition data?

Data is an asset for any organization. Increasing data and concurrent read/write traffic to the data puts scalability pressure on traditional databases. As a result, the latency and throughput are affected. Traditional databases are attractive due to their properties such as range queriesA range query is a common database operation that retrieves all records where some value is between an upper and lower boundary., secondary indicesA secondary index is a way to efficiently access records in a database by means of some piece of information other than the primary key., and transactionsA transaction is a single logical unit of work that accesses and possibly modifies the contents of a database. with the ACID properties.

At some point, a single node-based database isn’t enough to tackle the load. We might need to distribute the data over many nodes but still export all the nice properties of relational databases. In practice, it has proved challenging to provide single-node database-like properties over a distributed database.

One solution is to move data to a NoSQL-like system. However, the historical codebase and its close cohesion with traditional databases make it an expensive problem to tackle.

Organizations might scale traditional databases by using a third-party solution. But often, integrating a third-party solution has its complexities. More importantly, there are abundant opportunities to optimize for the specific problem at hand and get much better performance than a general-purpose solution.

Data partitioning (or sharding) enables us to use multiple nodes where each node manages some part of the whole data. To handle increasing query rates and data amounts, we strive for balanced partitions and balanced read/write load.

We’ll discuss different ways to partition data, related challenges, and their solutions in this lesson.