DeMorgan’s Second Law

DeMorgan’s second law is about the complement of the intersection of sets.

Complement of the intersection of sets

If we want to take the complement of a set defined in terms of set intersections, DeMorgan’s second laws a way to do that. For any arbitrary sets AA and BB, if we want to compute (AB)\overline{(A\cap B)}, it isn’t equal to AB\overline{A} \cap \overline{B}. We can demonstrate this fact with the help of an example.

Let us take some sets to make a concrete example. We assume that U={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}\mathbb{U}=\{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}, A={2,3,4,5,6}A=\{2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}, and B={1,3,5,7}B=\{1, 3, 5, 7\}. From this information, we can derive the following:

AB={3,5}A\cap B = \{3, 5\}

A={0,1,7,8,9}\overline{A} =\{0, 1, 7, 8, 9\}

B={0,2,4,6,8,9}\overline{B}=\{0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9\}

AB={0,1,2,4,6,7,8,9}\overline{A \cap B} = \{0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9\}

AB={0,8,9}\overline{A}\cap \overline{B} = \{0, 8, 9\}

As a result, it’s evident that (AB)AB\overline{(A\cap B)} \ne \overline{A} \cap \overline{B}.

For any arbitrary sets AA and BB, DeMorgan’s second law tells us that (AB)=AB\overline{(A\cap B)}= \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}.

Let’s see the argument for why this is true. First, we show that (AB)(AB)\overline{(A\cap B)}\sube (\overline{A} \cup \overline{B}).

Get hands-on with 1400+ tech skills courses.