Analysis of Correctness and Running-Time
Understand the need of correctness and running time to implement scapegoat trees.
We'll cover the following
In this module, we analyze the correctness and amortized running time of operations on a ScapegoatTree
.
Correctness
We first prove the correctness by showing that, when the add(x)
operation results in a node that violates Condition (1 as discussed previously), then we can always find a scapegoat:
Lemma 1:
Let be a node of q in a ScapegoatTree
. Then
there exists a node on the path from to the root such that.
Proof: Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that this is not the case, and
for all nodes on the path from to the root. Denote the path from the root to as = . Then, we have and, more generally,
But this gives a contradiction, since , hence
Create a free account to access the full course.
By signing up, you agree to Educative's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy