PyTorch vs. Keras
Deep learning is a subset of machine learning that uses artificial neural networks with several layers to learn input representations/patterns. A suitable deep learning framework is critical because it affects the development process and model performance. PyTorch and Keras are two of the most popular deep learning frameworks. These provide many functions and powerful tools for developing and training neural networks. Let’s go through the differences between PyTorch and Keras in depth:
What is PyTorch?
PyTorch is an open-source machine learning framework created mainly by Facebook’s AI Research Lab (FAIR). It offers a dynamic and adaptable method for creating neural networks, making deep learning-building models simple and effective. It is well known for its dynamic computational graphs, ease of use, simplicity, adaptability, and efficient memory use.
What is Keras?
Keras is an open-source neural network library built in Python. It is intended to be user-friendly, modular, and extendable, enabling simple and quick experimentation with deep learning models. It provides a high-level interface to popular deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow, Theano, and Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK) allowing developers to quickly build, train, and deploy neural networks.
Advantages
Some of the key features of both frameworks are mentioned below:
PyTorch
-
It supports dynamic computation graphs, allowing for flexible and easy model building.
-
It integrates smoothly with Python, using its large pool of libraries and tools.
-
It supports imperative programming, providing a more natural and intuitive approach to exploration. Users may create and execute real-time actions, simplifying debugging and exploration.
-
PyTorch’s automatic differentiation and gradient computation facilitates backpropagation and neural network training.
Keras
-
It provides a simple interface that allows beginners to easily create and experiment with neural networks.
-
Its high-level architecture allows for smooth integration with TensorFlow, Theano, and Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK) as backend engines.
-
Keras’ simplicity makes it ideal for quick prototyping, reducing the development cycle.
-
Its default package includes multiple pretrained models to go along and experiment.
Disadvantages
Some of the limitations of both frameworks are mentioned below:
PyTorch
-
It is extremely adaptable, so it may not always provide the same speed optimization as other frameworks, such as TensorFlow.
-
Beginners may find it more difficult to understand due to its dynamic nature and imperative programming approach.
Keras
-
Keras provides simplicity but may lack the flexibility needed for extensive customization.
-
Its high-level nature implies users have less control over low-level aspects than other frameworks like PyTorch.
PyTorch vs. Keras
Parameters | PyTorch | Keras |
Type | It is a low-level API. | It is a high-level API. |
Architecture | It features complex and nonreadable architecture. | It has simple, readable, and concise architecture. |
Backend | It does not support backend implementation. | It has backend support including TensorFlow, Theano, and Microsoft CNTK backend. |
Debugging | It provides simple and easy debugging. | It has a simpler architecture and often does not require debugging. |
Graphs | It provides static computation graphs. | It provides dynamic computation graphs. |
Speed | It offers fast speed and is suitable for high-performance tasks. | It is slower compared to PyTorch. |
Language | It is written in Lua. | It is written in Python. |
Support | It has a large community support. | It has a small community support. |
Choosing between PyTorch and Keras
The choice between PyTorch and Keras is based on individual requirements. PyTorch is flexible and dynamic, perfect for research and demanding tasks such as custom architecture development or fine-tuning of models. In contrast, Keras is suitable for rapid prototyping, common tasks with prebuilt models, and smooth integration with TensorFlow’s ecosystem. When deciding between PyTorch and Keras, we must consider our project requirements and knowledge of the frameworks.
In conclusion, we learned about two deep learning models: PyTorch and Keras. The decision between the two frameworks is based on specific needs and individual preferences. PyTorch excels in flexibility and dynamic computation graphs, while Keras is simple and easy to use, especially for beginners.
Free Resources
