Testing a software is a vital part of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). Different types of testing take place to ensure different measures of quality.
In comparison testing, we compare the software in development to similar softwares already available in the market. It helps to assess our software compared to the existing products. This can help us figure out how to improve our software and make it stand out in the market.
There are no fixed criteria for comparison testing. The criteria entirely depend on the kind of software that is being produced, but there can be two phases, for our ease and for more chances of finding areas of improvement:
Mostly, the use-cases for comparison testing are built with business requirements in mind. The ultimate goal of this kind of testing is to create a software that will capture attention in the market. To ensure that this happens, we compare our software to similar existing products, identify areas of improvement, and work on them to build an improved version of our software.
There is no specific time to perform comparison testing. It can be performed at any point in time while the software is being developed.
Mostly, it is done after a certain set of functionalities is developed and ready.
A few advantages of comparison testing are listed below:
A few disadvantages of comparison testing are listed below:
Let’s imagine that we’re making an inventory management program.
In Phase 1, we will ensure that all the standard accounting and finance rules are applied correctly in our software. There must be no loopholes when it comes to generally accepted practices of accounting and finance.
In Phase 2, we will compare our software with existing products for factors like ease of use, speed, security, etc.