Whistleblowing
Learn how whistleblowers can often face ethical dilemmas.
We'll cover the following...
Given the scenario below, select the approach that you would choose from the options provided.
Scenario
You’ve recently started working as a data manager in an energy company. It hasn’t been a lot of time with the company but you soon find out that something is amiss in the financial systems. The numbers just don’t add up and there are irregularities in the financial statements. For example, you see a pattern of recording one-time sales as a recurring revenue, and expired deals or contracts are intentionally kept active to delay necessary write-offs. It almost seems as if the company’s revenues are falsely increased and its debts are hidden.
You understand the gravity of what you’ve uncovered. These actions are not just questionable; they border on fraudulent accounting practices. The implications of this behavior are far-reaching, potentially leading to severe financial consequences for both the company and its stakeholders.
After some deliberation, you take this case to your higher-up. It never crosses your mind that your report will not be taken seriously. Though your higher-up listens to you, in just a few days’ time, you realize that no action has been taken to investigate the case. In fact, you feel that you aren’t given any real work to do and are moved from the executive floor. You feel isolated and are very disappointed.
You contemplate approaching the CEO, hoping that they’re unaware of these practices. However, doubts gnaw at you. What if your concerns fall on deaf ears? What if your superiors dismiss it or, worse, are involved? The consequences of your actions could affect your career and personal life.
You consider seeking advice from trusted colleagues, gathering more evidence, or perhaps utilizing an anonymous reporting channel. Each option carries its own risks and potential rewards.
What do you choose to do?
Case study
In 2013,