Statement

You are given a 2D array, accounts, where each row, accounts[i], is an array of strings, such that the first element, accounts[i][0], is a name, while the remaining elements are emails associated with that account. Your task is to determine if two accounts belong to the same person by checking if both accounts have the same name and at least one common email address.

If two accounts have the same name, they might belong to different people since people can have the same name. However, all accounts that belong to one person will have the same name. This implies that a single person can hold multiple accounts.

The output should be a 2D array in which the first element of each row is the name, and the rest of the elements are the merged list of that user’s email addresses in sorted order. There should be one row for each distinct user, and for each user, each email address should be listed only once.

Note: Please use a sort function that sorts the email addresses based on the ASCII value of each character.

Constraints:

• $1 <=$ accounts.length $<= 100$

• $2 <=$ accounts[i].length $<= 10$

• $1 <=$ accounts[i][j].length $<= 30$

• Because accounts[i][0] is the name of any person, it should contain only English letters.

• For $j>0$, accounts[i][j] should be a valid email.

Solution

We can use the union find pattern to effectively merge the accounts with common emails. We begin by assigning unique IDs to each account, with each ID representing a distinct set. Then, we traverse all the accounts along with their associated emails. During this iteration, each email is mapped to the ID of its corresponding account. If an email is encountered for the second time, indicating it is shared between accounts, we merge the sets using the union method. This step consolidates accounts that share common emails into single entities. After processing all the accounts, we iterate through each merged account and sort the emails within them.

To use the union find pattern, we create and use the UnionFind class, which has two primary methods:

• find(node): Returns the set’s main representative, the root parent, of a given node.

• union(node1, node2): Merges the sets of node1 and node2 into one.

First, we assign a unique ID (an integer value) to each account, making them the representative of their sets. For example, if we have the accounts = $[ ~[Emma, ~e@mail.com], ~[Bob, ~b@mail.com], ~[Emma, ~e2@mail.com, ~e@mail.com] ~]$, we assign them the IDs $0$, $1$, and $2$. We create an array to store these IDs, that is, parents = $[0,~1,~2]$.

Next, we iterate over the given accounts, and for each account, we iterate over its associated emails and map them to one of the parents. If an email is seen for the first time, it gets the ID of its current parent. However, if the email is being seen for the second time, that is, if two accounts share the same email, we take the union of this email’s previously assigned ID and its current ID to make a connection between them. For example, for accounts = $[ ~[Emma, ~e@mail.com], ~[Bob, ~b@mail.com], ~[Emma, ~e2@mail.com, ~e@mail.com] ~]$, we assign $e@mail.com$ the ID of its current parent, $Emma$ (that is, $0$) when we encounter it for the first time. When we see it for the second time, we take the union, such as union(0,2), where $0$ is its previously assigned ID, and $2$ is its current ID. Here, we connect the two accounts because they share the same email. This will eventually change the ID of the second $Emma$ account to the first $Emma$ account such that now, parents = $[0,~1,~0]$, representing that both accounts belong to the same person.

After the mapping above, we merge all the accounts sharing emails into single accounts. To achieve this, we use find(node) for each email to check who is the root parent of the given node. Finally, we go over each account and sort the emails within that account. According to our example, the final merged accounts will look like this: $[ ~[Emma, ~e@mail.com, ~e2@mail.com], ~[Bob, ~b@mail.com] ~]$.

Let’s look at the following illustration to get a better understanding of the solution: