Logical Identities
Learn about logical identities and frequently used equivalent propositions.
We'll cover the following
Definition
Logically equivalent propositions can be substituted in place of each other while making arguments or proving results. Such frequently used equivalent propositions are called logical identities.
List of logical identities
Let’s summarize logical identities in the following table. The propositions shown in one row of the table are equivalent to each other. That is, Left Right.
Identity Number | Left | Right |
---|---|---|
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
9 | ||
10 | ||
11 |
In the table above, the first two identities are DeMorgan’s laws. Particular fundamental identities need to be kept in mind. The following table contains more named identities or laws of propositional logic. Here “” stands true, and “” is false.
Number | Equivalence or identity | Name of identity |
---|---|---|
1 | Identity Law | |
2 | Identity Law | |
3 | Domination Law | |
4 | Domination Law | |
5 | Idempotent Law | |
6 | Idempotent Law | |
7 | Commutative Law | |
8 | Commutative Law | |
9 | Commutative Law | |
10 | Absorption Law | |
11 | Absorption Law | |
12 | Negation Law | |
13 | Negation Law | |
14 | Double Negation Law | |
15 | Associative Law | |
16 | Associative Law | |
17 | Distributive Law | |
18 | Distributive Law |
Distributive laws
The identity numbers seventeen and eighteen in the table above are distributive laws. Let’s first discuss them intuitively and then, with the help of the truth table, examine why they hold.
Consider,
If we look at the left-hand side, it will be false if is false. If is true, then the truth value of the left-hand side depends on and . If any of and are true, the expression is true.
This means, is true if, is true, or is true; and it is false, if is false, or both and are false. That is the right-hand side.
Now, let’s look at the truth table of this identity as follows:
(T, T, T) | T | T | T | T | T |
(T, T, F) | T | T | F | T | T |
(T, F, T) | T | F | T | T | T |
(T, F, F) | F | F | F | F | F |
(F, T, T) | T | F | F | F | F |
(F, T, F) | T | F | F | F | F |
(F, F, T) | T | F | F | F | F |
(F, F, F) | F | F | F | F | F |
From the last two columns of the above truth table, it is evident that the identity under consideration holds.
Now consider,
If is true, it is easy to see that both the left-hand and right-hand sides are true regardless of the truth value of and . If is false, then both and have to be true to make the left-hand side true, which also makes the right-hand side true.
Now, let’s look at the truth table of this identity as follows:
(T, T, T) | T | T | T | T | T |
(T, T, F) | F | T | T | T | T |
(T, F, T) | F | T | T | T | T |
(T, F, F) | F | T | T | T | T |
(F, T, T) | T | T | T | T | T |
(F, T, F) | F | T | F | F | F |
(F, F, T) | F | F | T | F | F |
(F, F, F) | F | F | F | F | F |
From the last two columns of the above truth table, it is evident that the identity under consideration holds.
Examples
Let’s look at some examples:
Consider,
- : Tora is eating salad.
- : Tora is eating rice.
- : Tora is eating steak.
Now,
- : Tora is eating salad, and she is eating rice or steak.
- : Tora is eating salad and rice, or salad and steak.
By distributive law, we know that So to express that, Tora is eating salad with rice or steak, it is logically equivalent to say or
For the second example:
Consider,
- : Ivan is a deer with brown skin.
- : Ivan is a deer with golden skin.
- : Ivan is a deer with white skin.
Now,
- : Ivan is a deer with brown or, golden and white skin.
- : Ivan is a deer with brown or golden skin, and brown or white skin.
We know that and are equivalent through distributive law.